Product has been added to the basket
Articles

Bruce Yardley appointed Chief Geologist

Bruce Yardley (Leeds University) has been appointed Chief Geologist by The Radioactive Waste Management Directorate (RWMD) of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA).

Chartership news

Chartership Officer Bill Gaskarth reports on a projected new logo for use by CGeols, advice on applications and company training schemes

Climate Change Statement Addendum

The Society has published an addendum to 'Climate Change: Evidence from the Geological Record' (November 2010) taking account of new research

Cracking up in Lincolnshire

Oliver Pritchard, Stephen Hallett, and Timothy Farewell consider the role of soil science in maintaining the British 'evolved road'

Critical metals

Kathryn Goodenough* on a Society-sponsored hunt for the rare metals that underpin new technologies

Déja vu all over again

As Nina Morgan Discovers, the debate over HS2 is nothing new...

Done proud

Ted Nield hails the new refurbished Council Room as evidence that the Society is growing up

Earth Science Week 2014

Fellows - renew, vote for Council, and volunteer for Earth Science Week 2014!  Also - who is honoured in the Society's Awards and Medals 2014.

Fookes celebrated

Peter Fookes (Imperial College, London) celebrated at Society event in honour of Engineering Group Working Parties and their reports

Geology - poor relation?

When are University Earth Science departments going to shed their outmoded obsession with maths, physics and chemistry?

Nancy Tupholme

Nancy Tupholme, Librarian of the Society and the Royal Society, has died, reports Wendy Cawthorne.

Power, splendour and high camp

Ted Nield reviews the refurbishment of the Council Room, Burlington House

The Sir Archibald Geikie Archive at Haslemere Educational Museum

You can help the Haslemere Educational Museum to identify subjects in Sir Archibald Geikie's amazing field notebook sketches, writes John Betterton.

Top bananas

Who are the top 100 UK practising scientists?  The Science Council knows...

Pointcounter point

BayleyHaydon Bailey* was co-author of May’s “Soapbox” article, which gave rise to some stinging criticism of micropalaeontology in our letters. Here is his response.

Geoscientist 22.09 October 2012

‘Recently the self-promotion of micropalaeontology has figured large in Geoscientist’, wrote Cornelia Kohler in the opening line of a letter that was starkly critical of this subject and its practitioners. I would respond that, as no-one else is promoting us, we have to promote ourselves. 

Read Jones and Bailey's original Soapbox piece

Kohler continues: ‘I agree that it is a disappearing core discipline and that it has important applications’ – so far so good: ‘But no one seems to ask why it is losing its significance. Unlike other disciplines, which are becoming more important especially in the petroleum industry, biostratigraphy has failed to enter the 21st Century.’

Significant

I would respond that this discipline has not lost significance. If anything, it is as significant as ever - in fact, even more so. Other disciplines need increasingly sophisticated technology to generate their raw data and high-powered systems to manipulate them. While the latter is true also of biostratigraphy, it scores over other disciplines by the fact that generating its raw data involves using a well-trained pair of eyes with an agile brain behind them. These represent a system that very rarely breaks down, even when 21st Century tools do.

Kohler says she strongly believes that micropalaeo ‘needs to reinvent itself and free itself from the past’. Here, I would echo comments by John Athersuch about such new techniques as ‘biosteering’ and the state-of-the-art software tools we now employ to marshal our data. Kohler complains of what she sees as merely ‘saving’ the ‘old ways’. Well, maybe – though that is not, I think, by any means ‘all’ we are saying. Sometimes “old ways” are there for a reason – they work, and reliably. At wellsite, for example, 21st Century technologies are more widely used than ever before, but they are not immune from breakdowns - nor are they, in the end, as intelligent as highly skilled people.

‘By ignoring its shortcomings, as it has done for long time, this discipline will further lose importance and appeal’ Kohler concludes. Well, if this were true I would agree but micropalaeontology has lost neither importance nor appeal - just its support within the broader geoscience community - hence our ‘self-promotion’.
Kohler concludes: ‘There are sadly very few pioneers left and these are usually heavily criticised. So, I plead to micropalaeontologists: stop patting each other on the back, stop thinking it is a perfect discipline and start reinventing yourselves – geology needs you!’

Back-patting

I’m unsure about this point, who these ‘pioneers’ are and who is criticising them. But no- one has been doing any back-patting - quite the opposite. Micropalaeontology is probably one of the most competitive disciplines within geoscience. No-one thinks it a “perfect discipline”; if anything, we are constantly re-inventing the uses, applications and presentation of our data.
But on one thing I believe Claudia Kohler is, finally, correct, and on it we can conclude in a note of agreement. We are needed.

* Network Stratigraphic Consulting Ltd., Harvest House, Cranborne Rd., Potters Bar, Hertfordshire EN63JF. Bailey and Jones’s Soapbox piece was accompanied by an Online Special. E: Haydon@network-stratigraphic.co.uk. Cornelia Kohler’s letter appeared in the July issue of Geoscientist (22.06). This correspondence is now closed.